About this study
This report describes secondary analysis of data from the
original UK Study of
Abuse and Neglect of Older People.
The key aims of the secondary analysis were:
Our key findings
When the definition of mistreatment was expanded to include
mistreatment by neighbours and acquaintances and single, rather
than repeated, incidents of neglect and psychological abuse, the
one year prevalence of mistreatment increased to 8.6% from 2.6%,
when we only looked at mistreatment by family, friends and care
workers.
Using this wider definition, psychological abuse rather than
neglect was the most commonly reported form of mistreatment.
Read the full report
here.
How we worked
Researchers from the National Centre for Social Research and King's College London carried out this analysis. The secondary analysis was funded by the Department of Health and Comic Relief.
Potential Policy Impact
This study was part of the PANICOA series of studies - Preventing Abuse and Neglect in Institutional Care of Older Adults - a joint research initiative between Department of Health and Comic Relief to enhance dignity in care.
Methods
Our findings are based on data collected from the original UK Study of Abuse and Neglect of Older People.
We explored different definitions of mistreatment in more
detail. For example, we examined the effect of widening the group
of perpetrators to include neighbours and acquaintances as well as
family, friends and care workers.
We used multivariate logistic regression to explore different risk
factors for mistreatment overall and, where possible, for different
forms of mistreatment. This allowed us to assess several risk
factors at once and to identify which were still salient when
multiple risk factors were taken into account.